JSON vs YAML: When to Use Each
A practical guide for developers choosing between JSON and YAML for configuration files, APIs, CI/CD pipelines, and data serialization.
JSON (JavaScript Object Notation)
- ✓ Strict syntax, less error-prone
- ✓ Native JavaScript support
- ✓ Better for APIs and data interchange
- ✓ Faster parsing in most languages
- ✗ More verbose (quotes, braces, commas)
- ✗ No comments support
YAML (YAML Ain't Markup Language)
- ✓ Human-readable, less syntax noise
- ✓ Supports comments
- ✓ Better for config files
- ✓ Cleaner Git diffs
- ✗ Whitespace-sensitive (indentation matters)
- ✗ More complex spec, potential errors
When to Use JSON
1. REST APIs & Web Services
JSON is the de facto standard for REST APIs. Every programming language has built-in or well-supported JSON parsing libraries. The format is predictable, and validation is straightforward.
// API Response - JSON is perfect here
{
"user": {
"id": 12345,
"name": "John Doe",
"email": "john@example.com",
"roles": ["admin", "editor"]
},
"timestamp": "2024-12-05T10:30:00Z"
}Why JSON wins: Native browser support, fast parsing, universal compatibility, no whitespace ambiguity.
2. Configuration Files for JavaScript/Node.js
Files like package.json, tsconfig.json, and .eslintrc.jsonuse JSON because Node.js can require() them directly without external parsers.
3. Data Storage & NoSQL Databases
MongoDB, CouchDB, and many NoSQL databases use JSON-like formats (BSON) for document storage. JSON integrates seamlessly with these systems.
4. When Strict Schema Validation is Critical
JSON Schema provides robust validation. The strict syntax (quoted keys, no trailing commas) prevents many common configuration errors.
When to Use YAML
1. CI/CD Pipeline Configs
GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, CircleCI, and most CI/CD tools use YAML. The readable syntax makes complex workflows easier to understand and maintain.
# .github/workflows/deploy.yml - YAML is perfect here
name: Deploy Production
on:
push:
branches: [main]
jobs:
deploy:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v3
- name: Install dependencies
run: npm install
- name: Run tests
run: npm test
- name: Deploy
run: npm run deploy
env:
API_KEY: ${{ secrets.API_KEY }}Why YAML wins: No quote noise, comments for documentation, multi-line strings without escaping, cleaner for large configs.
2. Kubernetes & Docker Compose
Kubernetes manifests and Docker Compose files are YAML-first. The container orchestration community has standardized on YAML for its readability when defining complex infrastructure.
3. Application Configuration Files
For config files that humans edit frequently (database configs, feature flags, environment settings), YAML's readability reduces errors. Comments allow inline documentation.
# config.yml - Comments make this self-documenting
database:
host: localhost
port: 5432
# Connection pool settings
pool:
min: 2
max: 10
idle_timeout: 30s # Close idle connections after 30 seconds4. Ansible Playbooks & Infrastructure as Code
Ansible, Terraform (partially), and configuration management tools prefer YAML for defining infrastructure because it's easier to read and write than JSON equivalents.
Syntax Comparison: Same Data, Both Formats
{
"service": {
"name": "api-gateway",
"version": "2.1.0",
"ports": [8080, 8443],
"environment": {
"LOG_LEVEL": "info",
"MAX_CONNECTIONS": 100
}
}
}service:
name: api-gateway
version: 2.1.0
ports:
- 8080
- 8443
environment:
LOG_LEVEL: info
MAX_CONNECTIONS: 100Same information, ~40% fewer characters in YAML. For large configs, this difference is significant for readability.
Common Pitfalls
- • Trailing commas break parsing (no
{"key": "value",}) - • No comments - workaround is
_commentkeys - • All keys must be quoted strings
- • No multi-line strings without escaping
\n
- • Indentation with spaces (not tabs) - mixing causes errors
- •
yes,no,on,offare booleans (not strings) - • Unquoted numbers with leading zeros become octal in YAML 1.1
- • Anchors (&ref) and aliases (*ref) powerful but can confuse
Conversion Between Formats
Need to switch between JSON and YAML? Our converter tools handle the transformation while preserving data integrity:
Decision Matrix
| Use Case | Recommended Format | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| REST API Request/Response | JSON | Industry standard, native browser support |
| CI/CD Pipelines | YAML | Readability, comments, less syntax noise |
| Kubernetes Manifests | YAML | Community standard, multi-line strings |
| package.json, tsconfig.json | JSON | Node.js convention, direct require() |
| Database Seeding Data | JSON | Direct import, schema validation |
| Docker Compose | YAML | Official format, readability for infrastructure |
| OpenAPI/Swagger Specs | Either | YAML for writing, JSON for tooling |
Best Practices
For JSON:
- Use 2 or 4 space indentation consistently
- Validate with JSON Schema before deployment
- Use
.jsonfile extension - For comments, use documentation tools or README files
- Consider JSONC (JSON with Comments) for config files in VS Code projects
For YAML:
- Always use 2 spaces for indentation (never tabs)
- Quote strings that might be interpreted as booleans (
"yes","no") - Use
---document separator for multi-document files - Validate with tools like
yamllintbefore committing - Add comments explaining non-obvious configuration choices
Conclusion
Use JSON for APIs, data interchange, JavaScript-heavy projects, and scenarios requiring strict validation and fast parsing.
Use YAML for configuration files, CI/CD pipelines, infrastructure definitions, and situations where human readability and maintenance are priorities.
Many projects use both: YAML for configuration and CI/CD, JSON for API communication and data storage. Understanding the strengths of each format helps you make the right choice for each use case.